Conwep Software !NEW!
DOWNLOAD ->->->-> https://blltly.com/2t0aQC
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the current multihazard loading environments when future blast loadings are included. While most of the currently available software programs for the physical testing of normal design loading conditions have been validated, the testing does not include the blast environment. It has not been determined whether these programs can be used when blast loads are included. Currently, designers use multiple software packages to perform multihazard analyses when blast loads are involved, making it difficult to compare the results. This analysis has as major topics air-blast and structural responses. The three standard air-blast codes used are ConWep, BlastX, and SBEDS, and the four structural response codes used are SBEDS, STAAD, ADINA, and DYNA3D. All analyses are compared against a test series that loaded standard open web steel joist sections dynamically with an air-blast load. This paper compares the output and results of each program against the test results to determine if the software is comparable in an effort to simplify the multihazard analysis process.
The use of scaled experiments and physical models to investigate the complex responses of large-scale structures under high-rate loading is well-established. The approach however is recognised to suffer from deficiencies when substitute materials are involved as sought material-property combinations are not always available in readily accessible materials. This practical issue is one of scale effects where the behaviour of a scaled-physical model can depart sometimes markedly from the full-scale response. This was certainly the situation prior to the recent arrival of a new scaling theory called finite similitude with the establishment of new similitude rules but at the cost of additional scaled experiments at different scales. This paper examines the benefits of two scaled experiments in physical modelling to examine whether the existing problems posed by the paucity of material behaviours can be remedied by combining the results of two experimental trials at different scales. The focus here is on pressure-vessel response when exposed to projectiles and blast loading to provide non-trivial behaviours that are typically not easily captured with a single scaled experiment. The investigation is performed with the aid of a commercial finite element analysis software and the Conwep blast-loading analysis to reveal that the flexibility provided by two scaled models is significant. Although perfect replication of full-scale behaviour is not always achievable the ability to design scaled experiments with combinations of standard materials is shown to provide good levels of accuracy.
N2 - The use of scaled experiments and physical models to investigate the complex responses of large-scale structures under high-rate loading is well-established. The approach however is recognised to suffer from deficiencies when substitute materials are involved as sought material-property combinations are not always available in readily accessible materials. This practical issue is one of scale effects where the behaviour of a scaled-physical model can depart sometimes markedly from the full-scale response. This was certainly the situation prior to the recent arrival of a new scaling theory called finite similitude with the establishment of new similitude rules but at the cost of additional scaled experiments at different scales. This paper examines the benefits of two scaled experiments in physical modelling to examine whether the existing problems posed by the paucity of material behaviours can be remedied by combining the results of two experimental trials at different scales. The focus here is on pressure-vessel response when exposed to projectiles and blast loading to provide non-trivial behaviours that are typically not easily captured with a single scaled experiment. The investigation is performed with the aid of a commercial finite element analysis software and the Conwep blast-loading analysis to reveal that the flexibility provided by two scaled models is significant. Although perfect replication of full-scale behaviour is not always achievable the ability to design scaled experiments with combinations of standard materials is shown to provide good levels of accuracy.
AB - The use of scaled experiments and physical models to investigate the complex responses of large-scale structures under high-rate loading is well-established. The approach however is recognised to suffer from deficiencies when substitute materials are involved as sought material-property combinations are not always available in readily accessible materials. This practical issue is one of scale effects where the behaviour of a scaled-physical model can depart sometimes markedly from the full-scale response. This was certainly the situation prior to the recent arrival of a new scaling theory called finite similitude with the establishment of new similitude rules but at the cost of additional scaled experiments at different scales. This paper examines the benefits of two scaled experiments in physical modelling to examine whether the existing problems posed by the paucity of material behaviours can be remedied by combining the results of two experimental trials at different scales. The focus here is on pressure-vessel response when exposed to projectiles and blast loading to provide non-trivial behaviours that are typically not easily captured with a single scaled experiment. The investigation is performed with the aid of a commercial finite element analysis software and the Conwep blast-loading analysis to reveal that the flexibility provided by two scaled models is significant. Although perfect replication of full-scale behaviour is not always achievable the ability to design scaled experiments with combinations of standard materials is shown to provide good levels of accuracy. 2b1af7f3a8